tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31835720.post5834289819402737090..comments2023-05-20T07:46:10.187-07:00Comments on ex-apologist: Salerno and Brogaard's Critique of the Argument from Anti-Realism to Theismexapologisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09915579495149582531noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31835720.post-48829422558757557092009-04-14T11:29:00.000-07:002009-04-14T11:29:00.000-07:00Thanks for the kind words, Luke!Thanks for the kind words, Luke!exapologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09915579495149582531noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31835720.post-82445603881327141232009-04-14T02:00:00.000-07:002009-04-14T02:00:00.000-07:00This blog is a goldmine.This blog is a goldmine.Lukehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12968634190280933116noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31835720.post-43985122748153251212009-04-13T19:43:00.000-07:002009-04-13T19:43:00.000-07:00Hi Chad,
Thanks for the reference to Peterson's p...Hi Chad,<br /><br />Thanks for the reference to Peterson's paper!<br /><br />-EAexapologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09915579495149582531noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31835720.post-55753919139342331942009-04-13T15:56:00.000-07:002009-04-13T15:56:00.000-07:00Similar to Plantinga and Rea's argument is Josh Pe...Similar to Plantinga and Rea's argument is Josh Peterson's, “Conceptualism and Truth” Ratio 13:3 (2000), pp. 234-238.<br /><br />http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/119037837/PDFSTART<br /><br />Thanks for the reference to this critique.Chadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00769271734220181852noreply@blogger.com