tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31835720.post6977818498437997112..comments2023-05-20T07:46:10.187-07:00Comments on ex-apologist: A New Defense of PSR Against the Charge of Necessitarianismexapologisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09915579495149582531noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31835720.post-29142279002096636532012-08-08T23:29:33.829-07:002012-08-08T23:29:33.829-07:00Thanks, Rayndeon. I've only skimmed it so far,...Thanks, Rayndeon. I've only skimmed it so far, but I think you're right that it looks to be a(n interesting) concessive reply.exapologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09915579495149582531noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31835720.post-9280973297136411312012-08-08T23:09:17.790-07:002012-08-08T23:09:17.790-07:00The author appears to accept necessitarianism, but...The author appears to accept necessitarianism, but argues that we can rely on a notion of "per se possibility" to do modal work for us, despite everything necessarily existing. At least, that's my impression of the paper thus far. <br /><br />Here's an early preprint of it: http://fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu/mlin/rationalism.pdfRayndeonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14288435564500319699noreply@blogger.com