The author appears to accept necessitarianism, but argues that we can rely on a notion of "per se possibility" to do modal work for us, despite everything necessarily existing. At least, that's my impression of the paper thus far.
Here's an early preprint of it: http://fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu/mlin/rationalism.pdf
2 comments:
The author appears to accept necessitarianism, but argues that we can rely on a notion of "per se possibility" to do modal work for us, despite everything necessarily existing. At least, that's my impression of the paper thus far.
Here's an early preprint of it: http://fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu/mlin/rationalism.pdf
Thanks, Rayndeon. I've only skimmed it so far, but I think you're right that it looks to be a(n interesting) concessive reply.
Post a Comment