Review of Azzam's Nietzsche Versus Paul

Matthew Meyer reviews the book for NDPR.

Dougherty & Tweedt's New Survey Article on Recent Work in Religious Epistemology...

...has recently come out at Philosophy Compass. Here's the abstract:

Religious epistemology is the study of how subjects' religious beliefs can have, or fail to have, some form of positive epistemic status (such as knowledge, justification, warrant, and rationality) and whether they even need such status appropriate to their kind. The current debate is focused most centrally upon the kind of basis upon which a religious believer can be rationally justified in holding certain beliefs about God (whether God exists, what attributes God has, what God is doing, etc.) and whether it is necessary to be so justified to believe as a religious believer ought (in some sense of ‘ought’ more general than rational justification). Engaging these issues are primarily three groups of people who call themselves ‘fideists’, ‘Reformed epistemologists’, and ‘evidentialists’. Each group has a position, but the positions are not mutually exclusive in every case, and in the debate, the names better describe the groups' emphases than mutually exclusive positions in the debate. In this article, we will first give a brief historical survey of evidentialism, fideism, and reformed epistemology. Second, we will give the fideist's position. Third, we will give the evidentialist's position. Fourth, we will give the reformed epistemologist's position, and last, we will include some comments on the current state of the debate, where we will show that the groups' positions are not mutually exclusive.

And if a copy should find its way to my inbox...
UPDATE: Thanks, all!

(Thanks to Clayton Littlejohn for the pointer.)

Review of Moreland, Meister, & Sweis (eds.) Debating Christian Theism

Alan Rhoda reviews the book for NDPR.

Videos and Podcasts: New Insights and Directions in Religious Epistemology

New Insights and Directions in Religious Epistemology was arguably the most important conference and workshop series in analytic philosophy of religion in recent memory. The videos and podcasts for its concluding event are now available online. Here's the list of speakers and topics:

International Conference on New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology

23 - 25 June 2015, Oxford University

Richard Swinburne (Oxford), “Phenomenal Conservatism and Religious Belief"

Peter van Inwagen (Notre Dame), “The Rev'd Bayes and the Life Everlasting"

Paulina Sliwa (Cambridge), “Show and Tell"

Keith DeRose (Yale), “How to Appear to Know that God Exists"

Hans Halvorson (Princeton), “Foundations of the Fine-Tuning Argument"

Jennifer Lackey (Northwestern), “What is Justified Group Belief?"

John Hawthorne (Oxford/USC), “Fine-Tuning Fine-Tuning"

Richard Cross (Notre Dame), “Testimony, Error, and the Reasonable Belief in Medieval Religious Epistemology"

Roger White (MIT), “Reasoning with Plentitude"

In Memoriam: Richard Gale (1932-2015)

Sad news. Details here.

Review of Bailey and Gentile's Rawls and Religion

Jeremy Williams reviews the book for NDPR.

New IEP Entry on Reformed Epistemology

Here.