Skip to main content

Home Stretch For The Dissertation

Hi gang,

After many years of darkness, light is beginning to dawn at the end of the tunnel. My advisor wants me to aim for finishing and defending the dissertation by the end of the quarter (woo-hoo!), so I'll be on a marathon to finish the final bits of it and do some revisions for the next 10 weeks. Unfortunately, that means that I'll have to neglect my blog until then. Still, feel free to leave a comment, and that'll function as a post-it note of sorts for me to return to and comment. Please accept my rain checks until then.

In the meantime, I'd like to ask you all a favor: if you catch me posting or commenting here, or at any other blog, please call me on it, and tell me to get back to work on my dissertation -- you have my permission (and encouragement!) to bark at me about it. My family is depending on me to finish, so that they can continue to eat and have a roof over their heads, and so that we can finally move on to the next stage of our lives together.

Yours sincerely,

exapologist

p.s., although I'll be on blogging hiatus until I finish, I can still be reached by email.

Comments

marie said…
CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I heard from Katie that you looked at a job up by me?

Good luck and congratulations on almost being done!
March said…
:)
Wes said…
Good luck; we'll be praying for you ;)
exapologist said…
Thanks, y'all! Talk to you soon!

-EA

Popular posts from this blog

Epicurean Cosmological Arguments for Matter's Necessity

One can find, through the writings of Lucretius, a powerful yet simple Epicurean argument for matter's (factual or metaphysical) necessity. In simplest terms, the argument is that since matter exists, and since nothing can come from nothing, matter is eternal and uncreated, and is therefore at least a factually necessary being. 
A stronger version of Epicurus' core argument can be developed by adding an appeal to something in the neighborhood of origin essentialism. The basic line of reasoning here is that being uncreated is an essential property of matter, and thus that the matter at the actual world is essentially uncreated.
Yet stronger versions of the argument could go on from there by appealing to the principle of sufficient reason to argue that whatever plays the role of being eternal and essentially uncreated does not vary from world to world, and thus that matter is a metaphysically necessary being.
It seems to me that this broadly Epicurean line of reasoning is a co…

Notes on Mackie's "Evil and Omnipotence"

0. Introduction
0.1 Mackie argues that the problem of evil proves that either no god exists, or at least that the god of Orthodox Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, does not exist. His argument is roughly the same version of the problem of evil that we’ve been considering.
0.2 Mackie thinks that one can avoid the conclusion that God does not exist only if one admits that either God is not omnipotent (i.e., not all-powerful), or that God is not perfectly good. 0.3 However, he thinks that hardly anyone will be willing to take this route. For doing so leaves one with a conception of a god that isn’t worthy of worship, and therefore not religiously significant.
0.4 After his brief discussion of his version of the problem of evil, he considers most of the main responses to the problem of evil, and concludes that none of them work.

1. First Response and Mackie's Reply
1.1 Response: Good can’t exist without evil; evil is a necessary counterpart to good.
1.2 Mackie’s reply:
1.2.1 this see…

Notes on Swinburne, "On Why God Allows Evil"

Notes on Swinburne’s “Why God Allows Evil”

1. The kinds of goods a theistic god would provide: deeper goods than just “thrills of pleasure and times of contentment” (p. 90). For example:
1.1 Significant freedom and responsibility
1.1.1 for ourselves
1.1.2 for others
1.1.3 for the world in which they live
1.2 Valuable lives
1.2.1 being of significant use to ourselves
1.2.2 being of significant use to each other

2. Kinds of evil
2.1 Moral evil: all the evil caused or permitted by human beings, whether intentionally or through negligence (e.g., murder, theft, etc.)
2.2 Natural evil: all the rest: evil not caused or permitted by human beings (e.g., suffering caused by hurricanes, forest fires, diseases, animal suffering, etc.)

3. The gist of Swinburne’s answer to the problem of evil: God cannot – logically cannot -- give us the goods of significant freedom, responsibility and usefulness without thereby allowing for the possibility of lots of moral and natural evil. This is why he has al…