Skip to main content

Republicans' 2008 Voter Suppression Strategies: A State-By-State Guide

Here

Comments

Ron said…
It is pro forma in elections for Democrats to seek higher turnout and Republicans to try and lower the turnout. When it comes to illegal tricks though, don't you think that the ACORN stuff is worse than what is allegedly being done by the GOP according to the website you provided a link for? ACORN is registering hundreds of thousands of people, many of whom aren't real people. Some states require that you show an ID when you vote but other states do not. In more lax states I can see a potential for massive voter fraud by dedicated Obama partisans.

It's easy to be highly partisan and just accuse the other side of committing fraud. The truth is more complicated than that, however.
exapologist said…
Hi Ron,


Doesn't it bother you that Republicans try to lower voter turnout?

But I'm afraid I have to disagree with you about the ACORN rumor. Fact-checkers have undercut the ACORN hype here. On the other hand, I find it deplorable that members of the GOP try to undermine democracy by, say, playing on racist sentiments, giving misinformation flyers in inner cities about voting dates and locations, caging hundreds of thousands of votes, ensuring that there will not be enough voting machines in poor areas, etc., etc.

Popular posts from this blog

Epicurean Cosmological Arguments for Matter's Necessity

One can find, through the writings of Lucretius, a powerful yet simple Epicurean argument for matter's (factual or metaphysical) necessity. In simplest terms, the argument is that since matter exists, and since nothing can come from nothing, matter is eternal and uncreated, and is therefore at least a factually necessary being. 
A stronger version of Epicurus' core argument can be developed by adding an appeal to something in the neighborhood of origin essentialism. The basic line of reasoning here is that being uncreated is an essential property of matter, and thus that the matter at the actual world is essentially uncreated.
Yet stronger versions of the argument could go on from there by appealing to the principle of sufficient reason to argue that whatever plays the role of being eternal and essentially uncreated does not vary from world to world, and thus that matter is a metaphysically necessary being.
It seems to me that this broadly Epicurean line of reasoning is a co…

CfP: Inquiry: New Work on the Existence of God

NEW WORK ON THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
In recent years, methods and concepts in logic, metaphysics and epistemology have become more and more sophisticated. For example, much new, subtle and interesting work has been done on modality, grounding, explanation and infinity, in both logic, metaphysics as well as epistemology. The three classical arguments for the existence of God – ontological arguments, cosmological arguments and fine-tuning arguments – all turn on issues of modality, grounding, explanation and infinity. In light of recent work, these arguments can - and to some extent have - become more sophisticated as well. Inquiry hereby calls for new and original papers in the intersection of recent work in logic, metaphysics and epistemology and the three main types of arguments for the existence of God. 


The deadline is 31 January 2017. Direct queries to einar.d.bohn at uia.no.

Andrew Moon's New Paper on Recent Work in Reformed Epistemology...

...in the latest issue of Philosophy Compass. Here's the abstract:
Reformed epistemology, roughly, is the thesis that religious belief can be rational without argument. After providing some background, I present Plantinga's defense of reformed epistemology and its influence on religious debunking arguments. I then discuss three objections to Plantinga's arguments that arise from the following topics: skeptical theism, cognitive science of religion, and basicality. I then show how reformed epistemology has recently been undergirded by a number of epistemological theories, including phenomenal conservatism and virtue epistemology. I end by noting that a good objection to reformed epistemology must criticize either a substantive epistemological theory or the application of that theory to religious belief; I also show that the famous Great Pumpkin Objection is an example of the former. And if a copy should make its way to my inbox...

UPDATE: Thanks!