Skip to main content


HT: Dwindling in Unbelief


Ron said…
Wow, that was intense. It surely can bring a lot of ill feelings about the God of the Old Testament to the fore. Years ago, I wondered some of the same things when I first read the OT. In response to the man's question of why God created the Egyptians and others if he was just going to order that they be brutally punished and/or destroyed, I'd claim that he created them to be blessed through Abraham's seed. Israel was supposed to be God's light to the world. Much of the Bible is about God trying to shape Israel into being that light. In the midst of their suffering in Babylon, they developed the belief in the general resurrection out of the belief that God and creation were good.

God uses times of great suffering for the greater good, even though we do not see that greater good at the time. The greatest evil in the world, the murder of God's own Son, was what finally brought God to all people.

What those OT stories tell us, whether they are history or myth, is that there is real peril that faces us. Our choices matter ultimately in the larger scheme of things. Yes, what was reported to happen to those ancient people was horrible, but we must not forget that we are only getting one very human side of the story.

God has the right and also the obligation to judge them for their sins. A God that never punishes is not just. God is also merciful and I am sure that those people can or already have repented. They could be with God in heaven right now for all we know. It is my hope, and I think the proper Christian hope, that Hell is ultimately empty in the end.

Popular posts from this blog

Epicurean Cosmological Arguments for Matter's Necessity

One can find, through the writings of Lucretius, a powerful yet simple Epicurean argument for matter's (factual or metaphysical) necessity. In simplest terms, the argument is that since matter exists, and since nothing can come from nothing, matter is eternal and uncreated, and is therefore at least a factually necessary being. 
A stronger version of Epicurus' core argument can be developed by adding an appeal to something in the neighborhood of origin essentialism. The basic line of reasoning here is that being uncreated is an essential property of matter, and thus that the matter at the actual world is essentially uncreated.
Yet stronger versions of the argument could go on from there by appealing to the principle of sufficient reason to argue that whatever plays the role of being eternal and essentially uncreated does not vary from world to world, and thus that matter is a metaphysically necessary being.
It seems to me that this broadly Epicurean line of reasoning is a co…

Notes on Mackie's "Evil and Omnipotence"

0. Introduction
0.1 Mackie argues that the problem of evil proves that either no god exists, or at least that the god of Orthodox Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, does not exist. His argument is roughly the same version of the problem of evil that we’ve been considering.
0.2 Mackie thinks that one can avoid the conclusion that God does not exist only if one admits that either God is not omnipotent (i.e., not all-powerful), or that God is not perfectly good. 0.3 However, he thinks that hardly anyone will be willing to take this route. For doing so leaves one with a conception of a god that isn’t worthy of worship, and therefore not religiously significant.
0.4 After his brief discussion of his version of the problem of evil, he considers most of the main responses to the problem of evil, and concludes that none of them work.

1. First Response and Mackie's Reply
1.1 Response: Good can’t exist without evil; evil is a necessary counterpart to good.
1.2 Mackie’s reply:
1.2.1 this see…

Notes on Swinburne, "On Why God Allows Evil"

Notes on Swinburne’s “Why God Allows Evil”

1. The kinds of goods a theistic god would provide: deeper goods than just “thrills of pleasure and times of contentment” (p. 90). For example:
1.1 Significant freedom and responsibility
1.1.1 for ourselves
1.1.2 for others
1.1.3 for the world in which they live
1.2 Valuable lives
1.2.1 being of significant use to ourselves
1.2.2 being of significant use to each other

2. Kinds of evil
2.1 Moral evil: all the evil caused or permitted by human beings, whether intentionally or through negligence (e.g., murder, theft, etc.)
2.2 Natural evil: all the rest: evil not caused or permitted by human beings (e.g., suffering caused by hurricanes, forest fires, diseases, animal suffering, etc.)

3. The gist of Swinburne’s answer to the problem of evil: God cannot – logically cannot -- give us the goods of significant freedom, responsibility and usefulness without thereby allowing for the possibility of lots of moral and natural evil. This is why he has al…