Skip to main content

Data Relevant to the Problem of Evil



Ron said…
Thanks for this. I've read this very page a while ago and it is always good to be aware that there is much suffering in the world.

Personally, I've always had trouble with the Problem of Evil. All the theodicies I've read have either been incomplete or just bad. I've concluded that simple Theism is unable to give an adequate answer to this problem.

This is where my Christian convictions come in. Jesus knew well that this world is full of suffering, sin, and evil. By taking on the worst of it upon himself he transformed it into something noble and even holy. God enters into suffering and promises to redeem it.

Despite the appearance that God does not care about the 25 to 30 thousand children that die each year due to poverty, if Christian theism is true then he cares infinitely about each and every one of them. To quote C.S. Lewis in Perelandra, "When He died in the Wounded World He died not for men, but for each man. If each man had been the only man made, He would have done no less."

The enormity of the suffering in this world inflames my hope in God. It spurs me on to care more knowing that ultimately the Creator of us all cares about all of these people individually, knowing them more intimately than parents know their children.

Of course, I would not ask you to believe in something that you do not think is true. Perhaps, all I am saying is that if you were to make a bet (this probably sounds like a familiar idea to you, lol), then bet on God.

Btw, I like the blog. :)
exapologist said…
Hi Ron,

Thanks for your thoughtful input, and for your kind remarks!


Popular posts from this blog

Epicurean Cosmological Arguments for Matter's Necessity

One can find, through the writings of Lucretius, a powerful yet simple Epicurean argument for matter's (factual or metaphysical) necessity. In simplest terms, the argument is that since matter exists, and since nothing can come from nothing, matter is eternal and uncreated, and is therefore at least a factually necessary being. 
A stronger version of Epicurus' core argument can be developed by adding an appeal to something in the neighborhood of origin essentialism. The basic line of reasoning here is that being uncreated is an essential property of matter, and thus that the matter at the actual world is essentially uncreated.
Yet stronger versions of the argument could go on from there by appealing to the principle of sufficient reason to argue that whatever plays the role of being eternal and essentially uncreated does not vary from world to world, and thus that matter is a metaphysically necessary being.
It seems to me that this broadly Epicurean line of reasoning is a co…

CfP: Inquiry: New Work on the Existence of God

In recent years, methods and concepts in logic, metaphysics and epistemology have become more and more sophisticated. For example, much new, subtle and interesting work has been done on modality, grounding, explanation and infinity, in both logic, metaphysics as well as epistemology. The three classical arguments for the existence of God – ontological arguments, cosmological arguments and fine-tuning arguments – all turn on issues of modality, grounding, explanation and infinity. In light of recent work, these arguments can - and to some extent have - become more sophisticated as well. Inquiry hereby calls for new and original papers in the intersection of recent work in logic, metaphysics and epistemology and the three main types of arguments for the existence of God. 

The deadline is 31 January 2017. Direct queries to einar.d.bohn at

Andrew Moon's New Paper on Recent Work in Reformed Epistemology... the latest issue of Philosophy Compass. Here's the abstract:
Reformed epistemology, roughly, is the thesis that religious belief can be rational without argument. After providing some background, I present Plantinga's defense of reformed epistemology and its influence on religious debunking arguments. I then discuss three objections to Plantinga's arguments that arise from the following topics: skeptical theism, cognitive science of religion, and basicality. I then show how reformed epistemology has recently been undergirded by a number of epistemological theories, including phenomenal conservatism and virtue epistemology. I end by noting that a good objection to reformed epistemology must criticize either a substantive epistemological theory or the application of that theory to religious belief; I also show that the famous Great Pumpkin Objection is an example of the former. And if a copy should make its way to my inbox...

UPDATE: Thanks!