I'm currently thinking about Erik Wielnberg's paper, "Dawkins's Gambit, Hume's Aroma, and God's Simplicity" (Phil. Christi, 11:1 (2009), pp. 113-128). The paper can be found here.
I have mixed feelings about the paper: I like it, but it overlaps considerably with a paper I'm currently working on, making my paper a bit redundant!
2 comments:
D'oh!
I think the author makes some good points, although personally I think that philosophers and theologians have failed to give Dawkins much credit. I'm writing something on Dawkins' argument, and I think he has made a good point about the existence of God being inscrutably low.
Post a Comment