Darren Bradley (CUNY) has recently written several interesting papers criticizing the fine-tuning argument:
-"Multiple Universes and Observation Selection Effects", American Philosophical Quarterly 46:1 (January 2009), pp. 61-72.
-"Weisberg on Design: What Fine-Tuning's Got to do With it", Erkenntnis (forthcoming) (Download from his site here)
-"Fine Tuning: The Anthropic Objection Cannot Be Avoided" (Still in progress. Don't circulate or cite. Download from his site here)
Well worth a look!
Quick Links
- Book
- 200 (or so) Arguments for Atheism
- Index: Assessing Theism
- Why Mainstream Scholars Think Jesus Was A Failed Apocalyptic Prophet
- What's Wrong With Plantinga's Proper Functionalism?
- Draper's Critique of Behe's Design Argument
- The Failure of Plantinga's Free Will Defense
- 100 Arguments for God Answered
- Thomistic Arguments for God Answered
- On a Common Apologetic Strategy
- On Caring About and Pursuing Truth
- A Priori Naturalism, A Priori Inerrantism, and the Bible
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A Quick Objection to the Modal Ontological Argument
(From an old Facebook post of mine back in 2018) Assume Platonism about properties, propositions, and possible worlds. Such is the natural b...
No comments:
Post a Comment