Howard-Snyder's Reply to the Moral Skepticism Objection to Skeptical Theism

Howard-Snyder, Daniel. "Agnosticism, the Moral Skepticism Objection, and Commonsense Morality"In Justin McBrayer Trent Dougherty (ed.), Skeptical Theism: New Essays. Oxford University Press (forthcoming).

1 comment:

Steve Maitzen said...

"In the present essay, I argue that the moral principle Maitzen imputes to commonsense is false and that a moral principle much more in keeping with commonsense is compatible with Agnosticism and my defense of it. Along the way, I mention multiple misrepresentations Maitzen makes of Agnosticism and my defense of it."

Having read Dan's paper, I'll just say that the feeling of having been misrepresented is mutual!

Partial Notes: Morriston's "A Critical Evaluation of the Kalam Argument"

As we saw in the  previous post , Morriston's (2000) paper, " Must the Beginning of the Universe Have a Personal Cause? " cr...