Skip to main content

Blog Help Request

Dear readers:

I'd like to add a sidebar feature that displays clickable book thumbnails that take one to amazon.com to look at or purchase books (inclusive 'or'). Any helpful advice would be greatly appreciated.

Yours,
EA

Comments

AIGBusted said…
If you're already an amazon.com associate, then what you need to do is login, find the books you wish to link to, copy the html code for the book ad, and then:

Login to blogger.com

Amongst Choices of 'Posting' 'Comments' 'Settings' and etc. Click on 'Design.' Then go to 'Add Gadget' and choose 'HTML/Javascript' and drag the box labeled 'HTML/Javascript' over to the side of the page. Then click 'Edit' button on the HTML/Javascript box. Then you shoud be able to copy and paste an amazon code.
exapologist said…
Thanks very much for your help, AIGBusted. I have now added a booklist in the sidebar.

Best,
EA
AIGBusted said…
Glad I could help.

By the way, I'm writing a rebuttal to Timothy and Lydia McGrew's Bayesian defense of the resurrection. If you are familiar with Bayes' Theorem, I could really use some help in making sure I have my numbers straight.

I've gathered together the facts I need, so I just need to make sure I'm not confused on which values to plug in where. I *think* I have it right, but I'd like to make sure.

Ryan
exapologist said…
I'm not the best person to ask about the finer points of Bayesian reasoning, but perhaps (ahem) some readers of this blog could offer their assistance.
exapologist said…
Btw: My own two cents on the McGrew's argument and those of their ilk: even if we grant arguendo that the evidence they discuss raises the probability of Christian theism above 1/2, the evidence for Jesus as a failed apocalyptic prophet (which is the mainstream view) deflates that probability right back down to at least 1/2 (or closer to zero, or so I would argue).

Popular posts from this blog

Notes on Mackie's "Evil and Omnipotence"

0. Introduction
0.1 Mackie argues that the problem of evil proves that either no god exists, or at least that the god of Orthodox Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, does not exist. His argument is roughly the same version of the problem of evil that we’ve been considering.
0.2 Mackie thinks that one can avoid the conclusion that God does not exist only if one admits that either God is not omnipotent (i.e., not all-powerful), or that God is not perfectly good. 0.3 However, he thinks that hardly anyone will be willing to take this route. For doing so leaves one with a conception of a god that isn’t worthy of worship, and therefore not religiously significant.
0.4 After his brief discussion of his version of the problem of evil, he considers most of the main responses to the problem of evil, and concludes that none of them work.

1. First Response and Mackie's Reply
1.1 Response: Good can’t exist without evil; evil is a necessary counterpart to good.
1.2 Mackie’s reply:
1.2.1 this see…

Notes on Swinburne, "On Why God Allows Evil"

Notes on Swinburne’s “Why God Allows Evil”

1. The kinds of goods a theistic god would provide: deeper goods than just “thrills of pleasure and times of contentment” (p. 90). For example:
1.1 Significant freedom and responsibility
1.1.1 for ourselves
1.1.2 for others
1.1.3 for the world in which they live
1.2 Valuable lives
1.2.1 being of significant use to ourselves
1.2.2 being of significant use to each other

2. Kinds of evil
2.1 Moral evil: all the evil caused or permitted by human beings, whether intentionally or through negligence (e.g., murder, theft, etc.)
2.2 Natural evil: all the rest: evil not caused or permitted by human beings (e.g., suffering caused by hurricanes, forest fires, diseases, animal suffering, etc.)

3. The gist of Swinburne’s answer to the problem of evil: God cannot – logically cannot -- give us the goods of significant freedom, responsibility and usefulness without thereby allowing for the possibility of lots of moral and natural evil. This is why he has al…