New Bayesian Formulation of the Kalam Cosmological Argument

Miller, Calum. "A Bayesian Formulation of the Kalam Cosmological Argument", Religious Studies (forthcoming).

1 comment:

Aragorn said...

This is a little bit unsatisfying in that the article gives us no reason to believe P(U|T&k)>P(U|*T&k) - but that wasn't the purpose of the article anyway.

Two Naturalistic Arguments for Why There is Something (Concrete) Rather Than Nothing (Concrete)

Here is a sketch of two arguments for why there is anything (concrete) rather than nothing (concrete), which are based on, or at least inspi...