Chalmers' New TedTalk on Explaining Consciousness



If he's right, then Russellian monism looks to be the closest match to perhaps the leading theory in the science of consciousness. Also, if he's right, then naturalists should take the base-expanding approach to accounting for consciousness, and not the shoehorning approach. Finally, if the leading theory is also the correct theory, then the argument from substance dualism has not only an undercutting defeater, but also a rebutting defeater in Russellian monism. Liberal naturalism FTW!

No comments:

Apropos of Nothing

An everlasting universal undercutting defeater   for (even very slight)-majority-rational-acceptance of right-libertarianism How to usher in...

Buy Me A Coffee
This blog is fueled by coffee; if you'd like to support content creation, I'd appreciate it!