Review of Pigliucci and Boudry (ed.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem

Martin Curd (Purdue) reviews the book for NDPR.

2 comments:

Bilbo said...

As an ID proponent, even if we decide it is not science, we still have the question, is it reasonable to believe that ID is true?

exapologist said...

No I agree.

Two Naturalistic Arguments for Why There is Something (Concrete) Rather Than Nothing (Concrete)

Here is a sketch of two arguments for why there is anything (concrete) rather than nothing (concrete), which are based on, or at least inspi...