Quick Links
- Book
- 200 (or so) Arguments for Atheism
- Index: Assessing Theism
- Why Mainstream Scholars Think Jesus Was A Failed Apocalyptic Prophet
- What's Wrong With Plantinga's Proper Functionalism?
- Draper's Critique of Behe's Design Argument
- The Failure of Plantinga's Free Will Defense
- 100 Arguments for God Answered
- Thomistic Arguments for God Answered
- On a Common Apologetic Strategy
- On Caring About and Pursuing Truth
- A Priori Naturalism, A Priori Inerrantism, and the Bible
Physics-Based Intelligent Design Arguments are Based on False Physics
Or so argues Bradley Monton in this conference paper. Especially helpful in evaluating Craig's appeal to Big Bang cosmology in support of the kalam cosmological argument. (N.B., A small criticism: It seems to me that the argument would be better titled, "Physics-Based Design and Cosmological arguments are Based on False Physics")
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A Modal Cosmological Argument for Atheism
Consider the following principle: WEAK PMC: Possibly, every concrete object (and aggregate of such) that has an originating or sustaining e...
1 comment:
So, I will concede that your position on intelligent design is the most believable position, but I will not concede that this is science. It is faith.| hechizos
Post a Comment