Hedrick, Landon. "Heartbreak at Hilbert's Hotel", Religious Studies (2013). Online First version here (subscription required).
Quick Links
- Book
- 200 (or so) Arguments for Atheism
- Index: Assessing Theism
- Why Mainstream Scholars Think Jesus Was A Failed Apocalyptic Prophet
- What's Wrong With Plantinga's Proper Functionalism?
- Draper's Critique of Behe's Design Argument
- The Failure of Plantinga's Free Will Defense
- 100 Arguments for God Answered
- Thomistic Arguments for God Answered
- On a Common Apologetic Strategy
- On Caring About and Pursuing Truth
- A Priori Naturalism, A Priori Inerrantism, and the Bible
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A Quick Objection to the Modal Ontological Argument
(From an old Facebook post of mine back in 2018) Assume Platonism about properties, propositions, and possible worlds. Such is the natural b...
2 comments:
Thanks for the alert. From page 15: "I've shown, taking words straight from Craig's own writings, that there is a clear inconsistency in what he says about the A-Theory and presentism on the one hand and [the Hilbert's Hotel argument] on the other." No surprise there. Craig says one thing to one audience and an incompatible thing to another audience and hopes no one is in both audiences (or else doesn't care if someone is). Hedrick is exceedingly charitable to Craig in his interpretation of the Hilbert's Hotel argument and nevertheless takes Craig down.
Agreed. Also worth noting is that Hedrick points out a number of occasions where Craig engages in dialectically illegitimate argumentative maneuvering, including a good bit of Craigging.
Post a Comment