Evolutionary biologist Jerry Coyne (author of the best-selling book, Why Evolution is true) has started a thread on the value of analytic philosophy of religion. The comments are often terrible or uninformed (inclusive 'or' here), and so the discussion would be greatly helped if more philosophers would jump in (looks at readers).
Thanks to J.L. Schellenberg for calling my attention to this.
Quick Links
- Book
- 200 (or so) Arguments for Atheism
- Index: Assessing Theism
- Why Mainstream Scholars Think Jesus Was A Failed Apocalyptic Prophet
- What's Wrong With Plantinga's Proper Functionalism?
- Draper's Critique of Behe's Design Argument
- The Failure of Plantinga's Free Will Defense
- 100 Arguments for God Answered
- Thomistic Arguments for God Answered
- On a Common Apologetic Strategy
- On Caring About and Pursuing Truth
- A Priori Naturalism, A Priori Inerrantism, and the Bible
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A Quick Objection to the Modal Ontological Argument
(From an old Facebook post of mine back in 2018) Assume Platonism about properties, propositions, and possible worlds. Such is the natural b...
3 comments:
Hmm. I didn't find the comments to be terrible. But then, I'm terrible.
I've no doubt they're terrible. Who'd jump into that?
The comments are pretty painful and representative of a larger phenomenon. They do put into pretty sharp relief why philosophy is so important, though.
Schellenberg's internet presence seems to be increasing! He's posted several comments on Prosblogion lately, and now here. I hope the discouraging comments of ideologues won't interrupt the trend.
Post a Comment