(Re-posted)
Here are the installments on Paul Draper's important article, "Irreducible Complexity and Darwinian Gradualism: A Reply to Michael J. Behe", Faith and Philosophy 19:1 (2002), pp. 3-21:
1st installment: Behe's argument
2nd installment: Three common but bad criticisms of Behe's argument
3rd installment: Are Behe's examples irreducibly complex?
4th installment: Behe's revision
5th installment: Are indirect routes to irreducible complexity really too improbable?
6th installment: Are direct routes to irreducible complexity really impossible?
Hi gang,
I'll be buried under a pile of work for at least a couple of weeks, so in the meantime, I'll be re-posting a few things. Until then, be well!
Best,
EA
1 comment:
This is my favorite of your serial posts. The article itself is wonderful and I would consider it the best response to Behe so far.
Post a Comment