Buckareff's Critique of William J. Abraham's Recent Defense of Rational Christian Belief

Here. It looks as though Abraham's case relies on a relativized version of Roderick Chisholm's epistemic particularism (i.e., Chisholm's notion of a "clear case" of knowledge is not taken to mean "clear to virtually everyone" -- i.e., Moorean facts --, but rather "clear to folks in my community"), and thus suffers from the same sorts of problems that inflicted Plantinga's version of it in the pre-warrant phase of his reformed epistemology.

No comments:

Apropos of Nothing

An everlasting universal undercutting defeater   for (even very slight)-majority-rational-acceptance of right-libertarianism How to usher in...

Buy Me A Coffee
This blog is fueled by coffee; if you'd like to support content creation, I'd appreciate it!