The recently noted post at NewAPPs is part of a larger trend in evaluating analytic philosophy of religion's current state of health. Below are links to some recent work and discussion on the topic:
Bourget and Chalmers' PhilSurveys results
Helen De Cruz's investigations.
Leiter's key post on Templeton funding.
J.L. Schellenberg's "Philosophy of Religion: A State of the Profession Report"
Paul Draper and Ryan Nichols' paper, "Diagnosing Bias in Philosophy of Religion"
Klaas Kraay's "Method and Madness in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy of Religion"
The special forthcoming issue of The Monist on cognitive science of religion includes papers on the topic.
Quick Links
- Book
- 200 (or so) Arguments for Atheism
- Index: Assessing Theism
- Why Mainstream Scholars Think Jesus Was A Failed Apocalyptic Prophet
- What's Wrong With Plantinga's Proper Functionalism?
- Draper's Critique of Behe's Design Argument
- The Failure of Plantinga's Free Will Defense
- 100 Arguments for God Answered
- Thomistic Arguments for God Answered
- On a Common Apologetic Strategy
- On Caring About and Pursuing Truth
- A Priori Naturalism, A Priori Inerrantism, and the Bible
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A Quick Objection to the Modal Ontological Argument
(From an old Facebook post of mine back in 2018) Assume Platonism about properties, propositions, and possible worlds. Such is the natural b...
No comments:
Post a Comment